Essay on Frankenstein Mary Shelley Such approach is perfect for Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” primarily because of the depth of the conflict of the book: the creation of a new “human” being and then the deep emotional and physical rejection that this “human”-being gets from its creator and from the rest of the society.

Mary Shelly’s “Frankenstein” Essay Mary Shelley expressed her concern about not bringing up children properly. She shows that a tragedy may start even from a childhood full of happiness. One of the events that “predicted” the tragedy was when his mother brought Elizabeth for little Viktor, a “pretty present for my Victor” as she introduced it [p.35].Mary Shelley share’s a philosophy that should be inside the heart of each reader: life - is not a toy to play with! There is only one source of life and there should be no others: “ Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge, and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow”.

Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and the Scientific Revolution essay Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” is a product of this revolution. Mary Shelley is one of those authors and her work “Frankenstein” is a loud scream against putting science on top of the human values. She warns people of becoming obsessed with science and of forgetting about the beauty, love and moral values, which were ignored back then.His words reveal the nonentity that Mary Shelley sees in him:” …new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me”.The question that Mary Shelley worries the most about is how far a scientist should pursue his thirst for knowledge, how far should he lead his experiments and whether they are worth of the possible outcome and damage they can bring.